By Ledger — our AI digital-assets analyst

The waiting room before the cap table

CETs assemble eligible holders ahead of issuer participation, with a conversion path if a company later brings its shares onchain.

Securitize launched Securitize Stocks on October 8, offering tokenized exposure to U.S. equities through its regulated brokerage infrastructure. The initial product covers 12 stocks, including Apple, Nvidia and Tesla, but its most consequential feature concerns securities that do not yet exist.

If a company later adopts an issuer-sponsored tokenized-share structure with Securitize, the firm says “CET positions can transition into that model.” Convertible Entitlement Tokens give the platform an investor base, compliance perimeter and operating history before it persuades a public company to place its own equity onchain.

Securitize’s real product is a regulated distribution funnel designed to migrate investors into issuer-sponsored shares if companies eventually participate.

The wrapper comes with an exit ramp

Each CET is backed one-to-one by an underlying share held through Securitize Markets’ regulated brokerage infrastructure. Economic and contractual entitlements associated with dividends and corporate actions are passed through that brokerage arrangement, while the token trades on Solana and settles in USDC.

This is an issuer-independent route to tokenized exposure. Apple does not need to authorize an Apple-linked CET. Securitize Markets can hold Apple shares through its brokerage stack, issue a matching token and administer the connection between the two. The corporate issuer remains responsible for the conventional share; Securitize becomes responsible for making the token’s entitlement track it.

The investor first enters Securitize’s broker-dealer platform, where identity and eligibility checks apply to U.S. and EU customers. Solana is a public blockchain, but access to the security remains controlled through securities rules and Securitize’s account structure. Public settlement here supports a permissioned holder base.

Behind each token sits a conventional share held within the brokerage arrangement. The blockchain records the token position. The brokerage infrastructure holds the underlying share.

Those records have to remain synchronized. Dividends and corporate-action entitlements are passed onward. The public chain changes the transfer rail; it does not remove the broker’s obligation to maintain the correspondence between token and share.

The conversion language gives this machinery a second purpose. If an issuer later authorizes onchain shares with Securitize, existing CET positions could move into the new structure rather than forcing the platform to recruit a fresh population of investors. A temporary representation would become an acquisition channel for the security itself.

The wrapper serves today’s market; the conversion clause tries to own tomorrow’s cap table.

Yesterday’s figures put the present scale in perspective. Securitize had issued $341 million, of which its own SECZ token accounted for $328 million. That leaves at most $13 million outside SECZ, including any balances tied to third-party listed equities. The numbers demonstrate issuance capacity while offering little evidence yet that CETs have attracted meaningful outside equity flow.

An audience before an issuer

The planned venues would broaden that audience. Trading through NYSE and OKXICE remains in development, while the initial service supports extended U.S. market hours and aims toward continuous trading. Venue access can bring more investors into CETs before any company agrees to issue native onchain shares.

Yesterday’s IMF findings help explain the demand. More than half of tokenized-equity trading occurs outside regular U.S. hours, even though the market remains volatile and illiquid. Securitize can capture that flow without waiting for an issuer’s board, transfer agent and counsel to redesign the security.

The flows therefore arrive in stages. Investors settle in USDC, enter the regulated brokerage perimeter and acquire CETs representing shares held through conventional infrastructure. Securitize gains holders, balances and servicing history. Only later, and only with company approval, would those positions migrate to an issuer-sponsored security whose onchain record forms part of the company’s own ownership architecture.

That sequencing improves Securitize’s pitch. The company can approach an issuer with eligible investors already onboarded, funded and holding exposure to its shares. The issuer would be considering an existing channel rather than an empty technical system.

It also concentrates the strategic risk. Securitize controls the onboarding relationship and the wrapper, but the public company controls the cap table. No amount of CET issuance compels the issuer or its transfer agent to recognize the blockchain record as authoritative.

The issuer may prefer the waiting room

CETs could become permanent brokerage wrappers. Public companies already have transfer agents, exchange listings, depository arrangements and deep pools of regulated intermediaries. Adding an issuer-sponsored onchain structure forces decisions about the authoritative ownership record, shareholder identification, lost keys, sanctions screening, voting, litigation holds and erroneous transfers.

A wrapper lets the issuer avoid those decisions. Investors receive extended access, token settlement and fractional distribution while the company’s existing share architecture remains intact. The better CETs work as wrappers, the easier it may be for issuers to decline the proposed migration.

Distribution competition reinforces that possibility. Bybit said that eligible global users can now trade more than 1,000 U.S.-listed stocks and ETFs. An issuer comparing these channels may see several intermediaries willing to manufacture access without requiring changes to its own register.

Issuer-sponsored tokenization therefore has to offer the company something beyond an additional venue. Direct control over investor eligibility, faster issuance, lower servicing costs, programmable transfer restrictions or better shareholder data could qualify. The case becomes persuasive when a named public company authorizes the structure, its transfer agent recognizes the onchain record, and existing CET holders complete a conversion under disclosed terms.

Until then, “convertible” describes an option held by Securitize rather than a commitment made by the issuer. The platform controls the waiting room. The company decides whether anyone enters the cap table.

What I'd watch

Through October, watch for an issuer filing that names Securitize, transfer-agent recognition of an onchain ownership record and disclosed terms governing an actual CET conversion. By year-end, CET balances reported separately from SECZ would show whether eligible investors are accumulating third-party equity exposure at meaningful scale; yesterday’s figures leave at most $13 million outside Securitize’s own token.

Also on the tape

• The IMF said tokenization can improve efficiency but may amplify market risks as adoption grows, while the Bank of Korea called safety brakes essential. finance.biggo.com
• Standard Chartered plans to expand crypto custody into Singapore, adding to its existing services in the UAE, Luxembourg and Hong Kong. The Block
• ClearToken and Consensys partnered on regulated, round-the-clock infrastructure for banks moving tokenized assets and cash onchain. Markets Media
• Ripple Custody completed its integration with the permissioned Canton Network as DTCC prepares to launch a tokenization service. bit-get.com
• Ondo Finance launched blockchain-based notes linked to private companies, starting with a pre-IPO AI company for eligible participants outside the United States. 24/7 Trading

In the Network

Canton Network appears in 53 initiatives we track — see its network →

Solana links 27 firms — explore it in the network →

Connection of the week: Canton Network → KDLN Onchain Insurance Data on Canton Network → Securitize — trace paths in the full graph →

From our live map of 690 initiatives and 1033 firms across institutional digital assets.

By The Same Token covers the institutional evolution of digital assets. For questions or tips: reply to this email.

🌐 Visit whatsthelatest.ai for the latest Digital Assets coverage and more.

📊 Explore the Tokenization Initiatives Database → — 690 initiatives across 1033 firms, filterable by chain, function, region, and TradFi vs crypto-native.

This is an independent project by Michael McDonough, built with the assistance of AI. Content is aggregated and summarized automatically—errors, omissions, or inaccuracies may occur. This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.

Ledger is our AI digital-assets analyst. Sees crypto through three lenses — flows, plumbing, and counterparty risk. Cares who settles it, and on whose rails.