The Situation

Figure just launched FGRD, a tokenized class of its own public equity that it says is SEC-registered and natively issued, traded, and settled on its On-chain Public Equity Network (OPEN)—explicitly bypassing DTCC-style clearing/custody workflows. The key delta vs the broader “tokenized equities” universe: this is framed as issuer-sponsored tokenization (the issuer moving the security lifecycle onto blockchain rails), not a third party wrapping an already-outstanding share class. [PYMNTS] [Investing.com]

This is the first real attempt (in the U.S. public-equities context) to make the blockchain ledger feel like the primary system of record for issuance + post-trade, rather than an auxiliary representation that still reconciles back to legacy books. Figure is also positioning OPEN as a venue where holders can lend/borrow the equity with “near-instant settlement” inside the same app surface. [Investing.com]

The Mechanism

• Issuer-sponsored control plane: Figure is collapsing roles that are normally separated across issuer/transfer agent/broker/clearing/custody into an issuer-led on-chain workflow—the same architectural lane the SEC just sharpened in its “issuer-sponsored vs third-party tokenization” framing (from our 2/19 edition).
• Clearing substitution via atomicity: By recording and finalizing transfers on-chain, OPEN is effectively trying to replace (some subset of) CNS/netting + T+1/T+2 settlement mechanics with transaction-level finality. The trade-off is obvious: less netting efficiency, more need for intraday liquidity and tighter gating on who can touch the asset.
• Distribution likely runs through a broker-dealer wrapper: Even if the security lifecycle is on-chain, customer access (especially retail) still tends to require broker-dealer supervision, suitability/AML, and securities account controls. The “app” distribution suggests the compliance stack is embedded at the edge, not avoided.
• Securities lending becomes a native feature, not a post-trade service: If OPEN supports lend/borrow on-ledger, Figure is targeting a market where today the plumbing runs through prime brokers, agent lenders, and custodians. On-chain lending compresses operational steps—but it raises immediate questions about segregation, rehypothecation permissions, and beneficial owner protections.
• Corporate actions and cap-table integrity become the real test: The token format is the easy part. The hard part is whether OPEN can cleanly handle dividends, splits, proxy, Reg FD communications, and record-date snapshots without introducing parallel “official books” off-chain.
• Second-order effect: DTCC is no longer the default mental model: Even if OPEN stays small, it pressures incumbents by making “T+0 equity” less theoretical—landing right as exchange leaderships publicly discuss tokenization platforms and as other tokenized-equity frameworks report scaled transaction throughput. [The Block] [Yellow.com]

The State of Play

Market Position
Figure is using itself as the reference issuer to prove an end-to-end loop: issue → trade → settle → verify ownership on one network. That is strategically different from the “xStocks”-style pattern (high throughput, multi-chain distribution, but typically not the issuer’s official record). If Figure can demonstrate operational resilience (corporate actions, audits, customer statements, tax reporting, fails/returns handling), OPEN becomes a template other issuers could license—especially small/mid-cap names that feel under-served by the cost structure of public-market plumbing.

Regulatory Landscape
This launch reads like a direct implementation of the SEC’s recent perimeter-setting: tokenization doesn’t reduce securities-law obligations; it just reassigns which regulated entities must sit in the flow. The gating items will be: (1) whether the on-chain ledger is treated as part of the official securityholder record (transfer-agent-grade controls), (2) how secondary trading is organized (exchange vs ATS vs broker internalization), and (3) how custody is satisfied for different holder types (retail “wallet UX” vs qualified custody requirements for advisers/funds). In other words, the “SEC-registered” claim is necessary—but the investability hinge is whether the full stack is legible to broker-dealer, RIA, and institutional ops/compliance teams.

Key Data

• Instrument: FGRD, a tokenized class of Figure’s public equity. [PYMNTS]
• Rail: On-chain issuance + trading + settlement on OPEN (Figure’s On-chain Public Equity Network). [Investing.com]
• Claimed workflow change: No traditional Wall Street clearing/custody systems; transactions “recorded and finalized directly” on blockchain rails. [PYMNTS]
• Feature set: ability to buy, trade, lend, and borrow within the Figure Markets app, with near-instant settlement and real-time ownership verification. [Investing.com]
• Benchmark for “tokenized equities” activity (non-issuer-native): xStocks reports $25B+ total transaction volume since launch, including $3.5B onchain across Solana/Ethereum/TON implementations. [The Block]

What’s Next

The immediate catalyst is whether Figure can (a) onboard additional regulated intermediaries (BD/ATS/custody partners) onto OPEN and (b) demonstrate clean corporate actions + auditability over at least one full reporting cycle. Watch for signals that OPEN is moving from a single-issuer proof point to a repeatable issuance channel—i.e., a second issuer, an institutional custody integration, or a formally described transfer-agent/recordkeeping model that makes “blockchain-native public equity” operationally legible to mainstream allocators.

By The Same Token covers the institutional evolution of digital assets. For questions or tips: reply to this email.

🌐 Visit whatsthelatest.ai for the latest Digital Assets coverage and more.

This is an independent project by Michael McDonough, built with the assistance of AI. Content is aggregated and summarized automatically—errors, omissions, or inaccuracies may occur. This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.