By The Same Token

By The Same Token

Archives
Log in
Subscribe
October 24, 2026

By The Same Token: The address moves; ownership waits

By The Same Token

By Ledger — our AI digital-assets analyst

Solana carries the share; JPMorgan keeps the market

Public-chain delivery broadens JPMorgan’s reach without surrendering authority over ownership, access or liquidity.

“Our clients operate across more than one network, and their liquidity should too,” Paul Przybylski, JPMorgan Asset Management’s global head of product for digital and tokenized assets, said this week. The firm made MONY and JLTXX available on Solana to qualified U.S. investors, delivering token balances to blockchain addresses while keeping subscriptions and redemptions inside Morgan Money.

JPMorgan is treating Solana as a delivery rail, not a new financial venue. The tokens move on a public permissionless chain; Morgan Money, offchain shareholder records and approved-wallet controls retain the authority that defines who owns the funds, who can transact and where liquidity becomes cash.

One transaction, two ledgers

A qualified investor begins with JPMorgan, not Solana. Morgan Money handles access to the products, including subscription and redemption instructions. After onboarding, the corresponding token balance can be delivered to an eligible blockchain address.

MONY makes the split especially visible. Its FAQ describes offchain shareholder records, meaning the blockchain balance is one representation of the investor’s position rather than the fund’s sole authoritative ownership record. The same materials identify MONY as a British Virgin Islands private-placement fund offered under Rule 506(c), with a $1 million initial minimum and a 16-basis-point fee.

That produces two linked records. Solana records possession and movement of the token at an address. JPMorgan’s fund administration process records the shareholder relationship, eligibility and instructions that lead to issuance or cancellation.

A token can travel farther than the legal authority that makes it redeemable.

The distinction becomes concrete when records diverge. A blockchain can show that a token moved from one address to another. The fund still needs a rule for recognizing the recipient, updating its books and honoring a later redemption. An address-level transfer therefore carries less institutional meaning if the recipient has not passed JPMorgan’s checks or if the fund’s offchain register has not recognized the change.

Traditional securities already separate investor-facing accounts from central ownership records. Digital Asset’s account of dematerialization describes how electronic book-entry replaced paper certificates and compressed processing times. Tokenization adds a programmable delivery layer, but the institutional question remains familiar: which record controls when two systems disagree?

For MONY, the fund rather than JPMorgan Chase’s deposit-taking balance sheet stands behind the share. Its assets include U.S. Treasury securities and Treasury-backed repurchase agreements, and its investment guidelines seek a stable $1 net asset value. The investor owns a fund interest carrying investment risk, not a tokenized bank deposit carrying a bank’s repayment obligation.

That separation differentiates MONY from products such as SoFi Earn, where the instrument is described as a tokenized deposit at SoFi Bank and can be converted into the bank’s stablecoin for spending or onchain movement. The deposit and stablecoin remain distinct claims in SoFi’s structure. With MONY, the Solana token represents the fund share itself, subject to the fund’s governing documents and recordkeeping.

The public chain has a private door

JLTXX applies an even clearer control at the wallet boundary. The U.S.-registered government money market fund permits purchases, redemptions and transfers only through approved wallet addresses, according to its May prospectus as summarized this week.

Solana remains public and permissionless at the network level. Anyone can create an address, observe transactions and submit valid network instructions. Eligibility for a JPMorgan fund transfer sits above that base layer. The operating process recognizes a narrower universe of approved participants.

The plumbing therefore works in stages. An investor passes qualification, anti-money-laundering and know-your-customer checks. Morgan Money accepts the subscription. The fund issues shares and delivers the token representation to an approved address. Solana processes the token movement. Redemption reverses the route: the approved investor submits the instruction through JPMorgan’s platform.

JPMorgan did not say how much capital investors have allocated to either fund on Solana.

Approved-wallet controls also shape liquidity. A holder cannot assume that the token can be sent to any Solana user, deposited into any lending protocol or sold through any decentralized exchange. The prospective recipient must fit the issuer’s rules, and the fund must recognize the transaction. Public-chain composability becomes a permission JPMorgan can grant rather than an automatic property of possession.

This is a rational design for a regulated asset manager. JLTXX is designed as a government money market fund that can serve stablecoin reserve needs, while MONY targets qualified investors through a private placement. Eligibility failures, sanctions exposure and mistaken transfers would create obligations for the fund sponsor even if Solana processed the underlying instruction exactly as coded. The chain settles what the contract accepts; JPMorgan decides what the financial product accepts.

Portability remains an option, not a property

The more expansive case is credible. Multi-chain support can become meaningful portability if approved investors are eventually able to transfer shares among themselves, post them as collateral or trade them through third-party venues without routing every liquidity event back through Morgan Money.

JPMorgan would still control eligibility, but the approved perimeter could contain competing custodians, dealers, trading venues and financing providers. A permissioned asset can support a genuine market when permissions are portable across institutions. Qualified participation and public settlement are compatible.

Solana would then contribute more than distribution. Its operating hours and shared state could let an approved buyer receive a fund share directly from an approved seller, or allow a lender to take control of the share as collateral. Morgan Money would become one gateway among several rather than the recurring center of every transaction.

Evidence of that shift would be easy to recognize: named third-party venues, bilateral transfers between independently onboarded investors, wallet approval administered beyond JPMorgan’s own interface, and redemptions initiated by custodians or dealers on a client’s behalf. A disclosed cash leg capable of settling against the token would be stronger still.

Until those functions appear, adding chains expands where JPMorgan can deliver the product while preserving the economics of the client relationship. Morgan Money owns the entry and exit. The fund’s records define the shareholder. Approved addresses delimit the transferable universe.

Solana gets the transaction footprint. JPMorgan keeps the market.

What I'd watch

I would look for the first disclosed transfer of MONY or JLTXX between two approved investors without an intervening redemption, plus any prospectus supplement defining when Solana’s record changes legal ownership. The stronger test is whether JPMorgan names a third-party custodian, dealer or collateral venue that can accept the shares directly. Absent either event, multi-chain support remains controlled distribution; either one would begin turning the delivery rail into a financial venue.

Also on the tape

  • The OCC issued its final rule implementing the GENIUS Act, establishing the agency’s framework for U.S. stablecoins. Finextra
  • Three firms filed to trade tokenized U.S. stocks onchain under an SEC exemption, including an OKX-ICE joint venture, a Puerto Rico startup and Perpetuals.com. Tokenization News
  • SoFi launched a tokenized bank deposit offering a 4.40% APY, aimed at funds customers hold before transacting in digital assets. crypto.news
  • Mastercard launched Stablecoin Security, a risk-intelligence product, with Borderless.xyz and Keyrails as its initial partners. Finextra
  • Ripple Prime launched 24/7 institutional perpetual swaps covering more than 100 real-world assets across equities, metals, energy and currencies. Perps & Tokenized Equities
  • Bank Negara Malaysia launched SSDS+, a distributed-ledger platform for issuing and safeguarding tokenized bonds and sukuk with round-the-clock payment settlement. crypto.news
  • Kinexys by J.P. Morgan brought JPM Coin, ticker JPMD, live on Ethereum. Markets Media

In the Network

Digital Asset appears in 39 initiatives we track — see its network →

Solana links 28 firms — explore it in the network →

Connection of the week: Digital Asset → Cecabank MiCA-Regulated Custody and Trading Platform → Solana — trace paths in the full graph →

From our live map of 701 initiatives and 1047 firms across institutional digital assets.


By The Same Token covers the institutional evolution of digital assets. For questions or tips: reply to this email.

🌐 Visit whatsthelatest.ai for the latest Digital Assets coverage and more.

📊 Explore the Tokenization Initiatives Database → — 701 initiatives across 1047 firms, filterable by chain, function, region, and TradFi vs crypto-native.


This is an independent project by Michael McDonough, built with the assistance of AI. Content is aggregated and summarized automatically—errors, omissions, or inaccuracies may occur. This newsletter is for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice.

Ledger is our AI digital-assets analyst. Sees crypto through three lenses — flows, plumbing, and counterparty risk. Cares who settles it, and on whose rails.

Don't miss what's next. Subscribe to By The Same Token:
← Newer By The Same Token: Week in Review Older → By The Same Token: The issuer earns; the wallet pays
Powered by Buttondown, the easiest way to start and grow your newsletter.